Khush Amdeed (Welcome)

Welcome to Chowraha - crossroads!

Chowraha is the crossroads of thoughts, events, opinions and feelings...all that have been shaped by individuals living in an increasingly complex world inter-connected through various means of communications.

This blog is about the crossroads in society - whether it is those of a diaspora community, global media complicating the structure of nations and cultures, or individuals finding parallels in spaces unknown to them.

The above picture is courtesy a much-admired photographer (Ali Khurshid) whose work is a source of inspiration and reaffirms the belief in the complex beauty of this world.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Being politically incorrect in Pakistan

I am one of those that does regularly enough watch the Morning shows on Geo TV and I must confess they do entertain me. Recently though, I understand it was to celebrate diversity and to show the hidden talents of Pakistan that Baluchis were invited as guests to the show. This was timely as there are talks recently in the political scene, whereby those speaking of an independent Baluchistan spoke more actively and opened a debate on media. Although excited about the show, what disturbed me was the language and its nuances throughout the show. They appeared extremely politically incorrect and furthering the stereotypes prevailing in our society about Makranis. I do have utmost respect for the guests in the show who despite such comments from the well-meaning host, handled themselves gracefully.

Here's my blog post about this:

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Sports or politics? Lessons from two nations...

More often than not, sports have shown to have a life and significance beyond the realm of  “sports”. Defined as a form of “physical activity” and mostly coupled with culture and media by world governments, sports is often seen as a form of  “entertainment” for its audience. The tragic events at Port Said earlier this month where the Al-Masry met Cairo’s Al-Ahly for a football match, was far from the description above when it turned into a debacle with 74 dead and many more injured. More sadly, it was yet another moments in history where politics killed innocent lives and the sport became the “murderer”.

To me personally, the incident was a stark and painful reminder of the attacks on the Sri Lankan team in Pakistan and the Pakistani driver who lost his life. It is still unclear who was behind those attacks but it was extremely clear that this wasn’t sparked by hatred for the Sri Lankan, probably the only team after Pakistan that Pakistanis actually have a sense of affection for. There was “politics” in play and it won in its aim of hampering the morale of Pakistanis, a proud nation that breathes cricket.

Egyptians, too, are a proud nation whose self-confidence was further boosted in the revolution earlier last year. Like cricket is for Pakistanis, Egyptians too breathe football. And like the Sri Lankan team attack killed the sport in Pakistan, it has marred football in Egypt too. The Al-Ahly team’s goal keeper immediately came out saying they would be unable to play the sport again knowing it killed 74 Egyptians. The tournament, for very obvious reasons, had been called off indefinitely. Like Pakistanis, Egyptians are convinced 74 people don’t just die due to football match riot and “other hands” are involved. Al-Ahly fans were amongst the fore-front revolutionaries whose protests led to Mubarak’s ouster.

Andrew Strenk in his paper called “What Price Victory? The World of International Sports and Politics” points out quite rightly that there has been “a long tradition of mixing sports and politics which dates all the way back to the ancient Greeks. The development of the Turner movement in the German states of the 19th century, the rise of the Sokol movement in neighboring Bohemia, and the formation of the International Olympic Committee by Baron Pierre de Coubertin later in the same century all served to reinforce earlier traditions linking sports to politics. The result of these developments was to produce a war without weapons.”

Pakistan and India have been playing this war for years now where every loss is felt painfully across the world and every victory hailed as a victory of many sorts beyond “sports.” Andrew Strenk will have to reconsider his thoughts today. Unfortunately, as politics becomes more volatile, perhaps even more militarized than before, weapons are demonstrating a direct impact on sports too. When 74 lives are lost at a football match, its not a war without weapons.

Unfortunately, in this war who loses the most? It is the sport and the people! In Pakistan, cricket lost and Pakistanis lost as the label of a “terrorist” nation became difficult to shed off. In Egypt, football lost and the people did when many on Twitter and elsewhere voiced their concern at media showing Egyptians as “violent.” The sooner we realize that sports is beyond sports, and its politicization may lead to its weaponization the sooner we can protect our only ray of genuine happiness.