Obama's Stand on Mosque Weakens
Our Mosque Madness
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON
Maybe, for Barack Obama, it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.
When the president skittered back from his grandiose declaration at an iftar celebration at the White House Friday that Muslims enjoy freedom of religion in America and have the right to build a mosque and community center in Lower Manhattan, he offered a Clintonesque parsing.
“I was not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there,” he said the morning after he commented on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there. “I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country is about.”
Let me be perfectly clear, Mr. Perfectly Unclear President: You cannot take such a stand on a matter of first principle and then take it back the next morning when, lo and behold, Harry Reid goes craven and the Republicans attack. What is so frightening about Fox News?
Some critics have said the ultimate victory for Osama and the 9/11 hijackers would be to allow a mosque to be built near ground zero.
Actually, the ultimate victory for Osama and the 9/11 hijackers is the moral timidity that would ban a mosque from that neighborhood.
Our enemies struck at our heart, but did they also warp our identity?
The war against the terrorists is not a war against Islam. In fact, you can’t have an effective war against the terrorists if it is a war on Islam.
George W. Bush understood this. And it is odd to see Barack Obama less clear about this matter than his predecessor. It’s time for W. to weigh in.
This — along with immigration reform and AIDS in Africa — was one of his points of light. As the man who twice went to war in the Muslim world, he has something of an obligation to add his anti-Islamophobia to this mosque madness. W. needs to get his bullhorn back out.
Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are both hyper-articulate former law professors. But Clinton never presented himself as a moral guide to the country. So when he weaseled around, or triangulated on some issues, it was part of his ultra-fallible persona — and consistent with his identity as a New Democrat looking for a Third Way.
But Obama presents himself as a paragon of high principle. So when he flops around on things like “don’t ask, don’t tell” or shrinks back from one of his deepest beliefs about the freedom of religion anywhere and everywhere in America, it’s not pretty. Even worse, this is the man who staked his historical reputation on a new and friendlier engagement with the Muslim world. The man who extended his hand to Tehran has withdrawn his hand from Park Place.
Paranoid about looking weak, Obama allowed himself to be weakened by perfectly predictable Republican hysteria. Which brings us to Newt Gingrich.
Gingrich fancies himself an intellectual, a historian, a deep thinker — the opposite number, you might say, of Sarah Palin.
Yet here is Gingrich attempting to out-Palin Palin on Fox News: “Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in Washington.” There is no more demagogic analogy than that.
Have any of the screaming critics noticed that there already are two mosques in the same neighborhood — one four blocks away and one 12 blocks away.
Should they be dismantled? And what about the louche liquor stores and strip clubs in the periphery of the sacred ground?
By now you have to be willfully blind not to know that the imam in charge of the project, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is the moderate Muslim we have allegedly been yearning for.
So look where we are. The progressive Democrat in the White House, the first president of the United States with Muslim roots, has been morally trumped by Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, two moderate Republicans who have spoken bravely and lucidly about not demonizing and defaming an entire religion in the name of fighting its radicals.
Criticizing his fellow Republicans, Governor Christie said that while he understood the pain and sorrow of family members who lost loved ones on 9/11, “we cannot paint all of Islam with that brush.”
He charged the president with trying to turn the issue into a political football. But that is not quite right. It already was a political football and the president fumbled it.
Comments
NEW YORKERS ARE NOW EMPOWERED TO RESIST ISLAMOFASCISM WITH AMERICAPHILE’S WISE COUNSEL LEADING THE WAY AS THE LEADING INTELLECTUAL AND IDEOLOGICAL RESOURCE FOR PRO-AMERICANS TODAY!!!!
YES!!!!!!! YES!!!!!!! YES!!!!!!!
DISTRIBUTION OF LIFE-CHANGING LITERATURE HAS PLANTED THE SEEDS OF REVOLUTION IN NEW YORK CITY AS ITS RESIDENTS ARE LEARNING THAT THE CONSTITUTION WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE A SUICIDE PACT!!!!!
MORE ARE NOW ABLE TO MAKE THE CONNECTIONS!!!!!!
AS THE MOVEMENT GROWTHS, IT WOULD BE BEST TO CONSIDER RENDERING FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO A CONSTRUCTIVE AND POSITIVE PROPOSAL TO REPLACE THE TERROR MOSQUE SUCH AS A MARK 16:18 PRAISE AND DELIVERANCE CENTER WHERE THE RAPTURE CAN BE PREACHED, MARK 16:18 SERVICES CAN BE CONDUCTED AND NEW YORKERS CAN BE DELIVERED OF DRUG ABUSE, SODOMY, TRIBADISM. POPERY, ISLAM, SATERIA, AND LIBERALISM!!!!
INDEED, AS WE REACH OUT TO THOSE TRAPPED IN RAPTURE-DENYING CULTS AND BRING THEM TO THE TRUTH, IT MAY NEVER BE NECESSARY TO ZONE OUT MOSQUES OR OUTLAW THE MASS!!!!!!!
I find your comment to be an advertisement that contains no rational thought, and one that is also devoid of facts of any sort. I am quite sure that it does not belong on a blog such as this.
After having read your comment four or five times, I can only come to one rational conclusion: You have no respect for the Constitution of this great nation, and you hate both logic and America.
Sincerely Yours,
Averroes